Mainstream monetary theory – neat, plausible, and utterly wrong – Lars Syll
In modern times legal currencies are totally based on fiat. Currencies no longer have intrinsic value (as gold and silver). What gives them value is basic- ally the legal status given to them by government and the simple fact that you have to pay your taxes with them. That also enables governments to run a kind of monopoly business where it never can run out of money. Hence spending becomes the prime mover and taxing and borrowing are degraded to secondary acts. If we happen to have a depression, the solution, then, is not austerity. It is spending. Budget deficits are not the major problem, since fiat money means that governments can always make more of it.
Financing quantitative easing, fiscal expansion, and other similar operations, is made possible by simply crediting a bank account and thereby – by a single keystroke – actually creating money.
One of the most important reasons why so many countries are still stuck in depression-like economic quagmires is that people in general – including most mainstream economists – simply don’t understand the workings of modern monetary systems. The result is totally and utterly wrong-headed austerity policies, emanating out of a groundless fear of creating inflation via central banks printing money, in a situation where we rather should fear deflation and inadequate effective demand.
The mainstream economics textbook concept of money multiplier banking assumes that banks automatically expand the credit money supply to a multiple of their aggregate reserves. If the required currency-deposit reserve ratio is 5%, the money supply should be about twenty times larger than the aggregate reserves of banks. In this way — the money multiplier explanation asserts — the central bank controls the money supply by simply setting the required reserve ratio.
In his Macroeconomics – just to take an example – Greg Mankiw writes:
” We can now see that the money supply is proportional to the monetary base. The factor of proportionality … is called the money multiplier … Each dollar of the monetary base produces m dollars of money. Because the monetary base has a multiplied effect on the money supply, the monetary base is called high-powered money. ”
The money multiplier explanation of banking – as expressed in the quote above – is nothing other than a fallacy. It is not the way in which credit money is created in a monetary economy. It’s nothing but a myth that the monetary base can play such a decisive role in a modern credit-run economy based on fiat money.
In the real world commercial banks extend credit first and then look for the reserves later. So the money multiplier explanation basically gets the causation wrong. At a deep fundamental level the supply of money is endogenous.
One may rightly wonder why on earth this pet mainstream neoclassical fairy tale is still in the textbooks and taught to economics undergraduates. Giving the impression that banks exist simply to passively transfer savings into investment, it is such a gross misrepresent- ation of what goes on in the real world that there is only one place for it — and that is in the garbage bin.
Source: Real-World Econ Rev, 24 Jun 2017 https://rwer.wordpress.com/2017/06/24/mainstream-monetary-theory-neat-plausible-and-utterly-wrong/Know someone interested? Please share