A qualitatively improving steady-state economy as an alternative to continued growth – Philip Lawn
A successful economy is one that increases the well-being of a nation’s citizens in an ecologically sustainable and equitable manner. Empirical evidence indicates that growth is now failing to augment the well-being of people in countries with high gross domestic product because it increases costs faster than benefits.[1] More disconcertingly, biophysical indicators reveal that high-GDP economies are well beyond the ecosphere’s capacity to sustain them.[2] While growth was a successful strategy for high- GDP countries during times when their economies were small relative to the containing ecosystem, this is no longer the case.
Source: Flickr cc
A successful economy in a world where economies are large relative to the containing ecosystem requires a new strategy—one oriented towards a steady-state, or physically non-growing, economy. There is, however, no blueprint for a successful steady-state economy. Hence, it is impossible to know what it would look like. Nevertheless, it is possible to say something about the precepts by which a successful steady-state economy should operate and the likely advances they would facilitate and engender.
First and foremost, a steady-state economy must exist at a scale that is consistent with the ecosphere’s sustainable carrying capacity. To achieve this, quantitative restrictions (e.g., harvesting quotas and emissions caps) must be imposed to limit the rate of throughput to one that is within the ecosphere’s ability to regenerate new resources and assimilate wastes. The need for explicit quantitative restrictions is necessary because market prices — and this includes government-adjusted prices — can only reflect relative scarcities, while sustainability is a matter concerning absolute scarcities. The fact that market prices reflect relative scarcities is what makes them good allocative signals with the capacity to facilitate a more efficient use of the incoming resource flow. However, efficiency gains will not reduce the total use of resources if they are overwhelmed by the throughput-increasing effect of a larger volume of economic activity. [3] Unfortunately, market prices cannot prevent this from occurring. Only some explicit restrictions placed on the rate of resource throughput can.
Importantly, since some economies are larger than what can be sustained by the ecosphere in the long run, some countries will need to reduce their rate of resource throughput. These nations will be compelled to downsize their economies prior to stabilizing them at a more appropriate physical scale.[4] It should be added that economic down- sizing would not only benefit corpulent high-GDP countries, but would provide also the “ecological space” for impoverished nations to experience some welfare-increasing growth before they, too, must eventually make the transition to a steady-state economy.[5]
Second, because the aggregate rate of resource throughput is the product of a nation’s population and per capita resource consumption, another important component of a steady-state economy is a steady-state human population. For this reason, high- population nations need to introduce population stabilization policies much like high-GDP nations need to introduce quantitative throughput restrictions to reduce and stabilize their per capita resource consumption.
Third, a successful steady-state economy must be characterized by a just distribution of income and wealth. To achieve distributional equity, tax and transfer systems should be used to guarantee a minimum liveable income for the poor and to impose a maximum income limit on the rich. The latter is needed to ensure that the order-of- magnitude income difference between the richest and poorest citizens is socially acceptable — a matter more crucial once growth cannot be used as a “rising tide to lifts all boats.” Some people would argue that the imposition of a 100 percent marginal tax rate at the designated maximum income would stifle incentive and initiative. Others, like me, would argue that any income above a certain level amounts to an “economic rent” (i.e., unearned income) which should be confiscated for reasons of fairness. Moreover, as an economic rent, income above the maximum limit can be confiscated without distorting the supply of labour and all forms of capital. As for a minimum liveable income, it should be guaranteed by way of legislation ensuring decent minimum wages and minimum conditions of employment and by introducing a publicly funded employer-of-last-resort scheme.[6] Given the important role that work plays in one’s psychological health, the latter is preferable to an unconditional demographic grant.
Moreover, if appropriately designed, an employer-of-last-resort scheme can ensure full employment in a steady-state economy by always rendering labour the most limiting factor of production.[7]
Fourth, with sustainability and equity concerns resolved, markets should then be harnessed to efficiently allocate the incoming resource flow. And crucially, the prior imposition of throughput constraints and distributional limits would internalize ecological realities and objective values into market prices. Raising the price of natural resources and the cost of particular production methods would compel firms to improve their operations qualitatively rather than increase their output to maintain profit- ability.[8] Consequently, there would be a new economic reliance upon other factors:
maximizing the use-value generated through production (which would increase benefits)
reducing the resource intensity of production by fully exploiting existing resource-saving technologies and by developing new ones (which would reduce costs)
better organizing the production process to increase labour productivity and reduce many social ills (which would increase benefits and reduce costs)Increasing labour productivity is important because it would lead to higher hourly wages and the opportunity to reduce the length of the working week. This would allow people to increase the time devoted to non- economic pursuits. It would also facilitate job sharing, thus making it easier to achieve full employment within the context of a non-growing economy.Fifth, one of the key requirements of a successful steady-state economy is the adequate supply of low resource- demanding and waste-generating infrastructure. Most contemporary infrastructure does not fall into these categories. Furthermore, almost all infrastructure has characteristics of public goods. Clearly, in making the transition to a qualitatively-improving steady-state economy, the economic role of the public sector is likely to increase. This means that the private sector must be willing to have some of its spending power reduced by government taxation in order to allow governments to acquire, in a non- inflationary way, the productive resources they need to provide more useful and environmentally benign forms of critical infrastructure.[9]Finally, the success of any transition to a steady-state economy is largely determined by the nature of the global economy within which all national economies operate. The free and easy mobility of international capital means that international trade is undeniably governed by the principle of absolute advantage (absolute profitability) and by global market prices that fail to reflect both the true cost of resource use and the productive contribution made by many of the world’s workers.Under current trading arrangements, any country that elected to adopt steady-state economic policies would be severely disadvantaged in a competitive sense. The potential impactof this has almost certainly deterred national governments from implementing steady-state economic policies, which is starkly demonstrated by the lack of any genuine attempt by a country to make the transition to a steady-state economy. A high priority for any government contemplating a steady-state economy must be a concerted diplomatic effort to bring about a global economy based on internationalization rather than globalization.[10] Without such a change, international co-operation of the type needed to induce a shift to a steady- state economy at the global level is unlikely to materialize.
Assoc Prof Philip Lawn is an ecological economist attached to the Centre of Full Employment and Equity at the University of Newcastle.
[1] Philip Lawn and Matthew Clarke, eds., Sustainable Welfare in the Asia-Pacific (Oxford, U.K: Edward Elgar, 2008).
[2] Global Footprint Network, Ecological Footprint Atlas (Oakland, CA: Global Footprint Network, 2010).
[3] Herman E. Daly, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development: Selected Essays of Herman Daly (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2007); Philip Lawn, “On the Ehrlich- Simon Bet: Both Were Unskilled and Simon Was Unlucky,” Ecological Economics 69 (2010): 2045-46.
[4] J. Martinez-Alier, U. Pascual, F.-D. Vivien, and E. Zaccai, “Sustainable De-Growth: Mapping the Context, Criticisms, and Future Prospects of an Emergent
[5] Lawn and Clarke, Sustainable Welfare in the Asia-Pacific.
[6] William Mitchell and Joan Muysken, Full Employment Abandoned: Shifting Sands and Policy Failures (Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 2008).
[7] Philip Lawn, “Wake Up Economists! Currency-Issuing Central Governments Have No Budget Constraint,” Munich Personal RePEc Archive (2011), http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28224.
[8] Philip Lawn, “Is Steady-State Capitalism Viable? A Review of the Issues and an Answer in the Affirmative,” in Ecological Economics Reviews, ed. R. Costanza, K. Limburg, and I. Kubiszewski (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 2011), 1-25.
[9] Philip Lawn, “Facilitating the Transition to a Steady-State Economy: Some Macroeconomic Fundamentals,” Ecological Economics 69 (2010): 931-36; “Wake Up Economists!” [10] Daly, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development.
ERA is affiliated with Rethinking Economics Australia, a member of the international network of rethinkers.
We promote a critical review of the economics curriculum that it better serve an understanding of economics in the real world which has been severely lacking in mainstream economic doctrine.
The Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) advocates for necessary changes in monetary policy, and for economic reform. COMER argues that a fair, equitable economic theory is well within our grasp, a theory within which monetary policy may be constructively brought into being for the benefit of all Canadians.
“Our initiative is committed to a full-money reform. Full money means: only the central bank generates money. Full money leads to a more stable, equitable and sustainable economy. But who exercises this privilege predominantly today? The commercial banks! This violates the principle of equality and is the main cause of financial crises.“
Founded in the US Violation Tracker maintains a record of the financial penalties paid by corporate and other large non-profits since the year 2000 for regulatory violations and other forms of misconduct. Data for the financial sector based in the US can be found here.
Thanks to the support of Transparency Taskforce Violation Tracker is also available for the UK. Time for a Violation Tracker AUS?
Records from companies with their headquarters listed in Australia can be found here.
Transparency Taskforce was founded in the UK to promote ongoing reform of the financial sector. It has members around the globe as well as in Australia who share a common purpose of making the financial sector transparent and accountable to the public.
An extensive catalogue of webinars can be viewed on their YouTube channel TTF TV.
ERA is a member of New Economy Network Australia (NENA), host to the Australian hub of the global Wellbeing Economy Alliance (WEAll). WEAll Hubs are place-based/country-based groups that promote new narratives, policies and ideas to make the wellbeing economy a reality.
Our current financial system diverts us from our real problems to ask, “Where is the money going to come from?” This should be the least of our worries. As long as we have vast unmet human needs and idle human and nonhuman resources, and resources which can be diverted from wasteful activities such as the military, finance should never be allowed to stand in the way of doing what must be done.
Could anything be more insane than for the human race to die out because we “couldn’t afford” to save ourselves? Prof John Hotson, co-founder of the Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER)
Covid-19 – articles directly related to the 2020-22 pandemic.
Ecological Sustainability – consideration of the maintenance of life support systems, environmental pollution, biodiversity loss, the climate system, geophysiological health, nutrient cycling, environmental impact of economic growth, environmental impact of population growth, the planetary boundaries, steady state economy. Economic analyses of, and the modelling of economic factors affecting, climate change and viral pandemics. Ecological economics.
Employment – studies and statistics relating to full employment, unemployment, underemployment, participation rate, U1–U6, Job Guarantee, and the psychological and health effects of unemployment.
Financial System – incorporating the central bank. deposit-taking financial institutions, commercial banks, primary bond dealers, Treasury securities, banking reserves (exchange settlement deposits), repos, state fiat money and commodity money, currencies.
General – articles about people, events or issues of a general nature.
Health and Wellbeing – including health funding, national health systems, pharmaceutical industry, impact of neoliberalism on mental and physical health, homelessness, drug addiction, domestic violence and abuse, psychological impacts of economic policies.
International Trade/Finance – issues relating to trade wars and their impact, tariffs and other restrictive practices, international and regional investment agreements, the pros and cons of trade deficits and surpluses, globalisation, credit rating agencies.
Macroeconomics – the study of large scale or general economic factors, such as interest rates, national productivity, inflation, price levels, economic growth rate, taxation, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW).
Neoliberalism – understanding those approaches that favour free-market capitalism, characterised by deregulation, tax reductions for the wealthy and corporations, reductions in government spending, and growing inequality. Neoclassical economics.
Post-Keynesian Economics – subjects and issues such as effective demand, factors affecting employment, financial fragility, monetary circuit theory, endogeneity, chartalism, the state theory of money, functional finance, Modern Monetary Theory (MMT).
Social Justice — concern for justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, and for opportunities and privileges within our society, including government welfare policy.
Technology — renewable energy systems and their comparison with nonrenewable energy systems, automation and artificial intelligence, other technologies with an economic impact.
Lynn Parramore is Senior Research Analyst at the Institute for New Economic Thinking. A cultural theorist who studies the intersection of culture and economics, she is Contributing Editor at AlterNet, where she received the Bill Moyers/Schumann Foundation fellowship in journalism for 2012. She is also a frequent contributor to Reuters, Al Jazeera, Salon, Huffington Post, and other outlets.
Her first book of cultural history, Reading the Sphinx (Palgrave Macmillan) was named a “Notable Scholarly Book for 2008” by the Chronicle of Higher Education.
Dr. Asad Zaman is currently serving as external advisor on the Monetary Policy Committee of the State Bank of Pakistan, and as Director of Uloom-ul-Umran (Islamic alternative to Social Science) on the Al-Nafi online educational platform.
He received his BS Math from MIT in 1974, MS Stat, and Ph.D. Econ from Stanford Univ in 1976 and 1978 respectively. He has taught at Economics Departments of highly ranked international universities like Columbia, U. Penn., Cal. Tech. and Johns Hopkins as well as Bilkent University, Ankara and Lahore University of Managements Sciences.
His econometrics textbook Statistical Foundations of Econometric Techniques is widely used as a reference in graduate econometrics courses, internationally. He is managing editor of International Econometric Reviews and on the editorial board of numerous journals. He has more than 100 publications, with more than a 1600 citations, in top ranked journals like Annals of Statistics, Journal of Econometrics, Econometric Theory, Journal of Labor Economics, etc. He has published widely in Islamic Economics, and is a leading authority in the field.
Ellen Brown is the founder of the Public Banking Institute and the author of a dozen books and hundreds of articles. She developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In the best-selling Web of Debt (2007, 2012), she turned those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust,” showing how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves and how we the people can get it back.
Dean Baker is senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC. He is frequently cited in economics reporting in major media outlets, including the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, CNBC, and National Public Radio. He writes a weekly column for the Guardian Unlimited (UK), the Huffington Post, TruthOut, and his blog, Beat the Press, features commentary on economic reporting. His analyses have appeared in many major publications, including the Atlantic Monthly, the Washington Post, the London Financial Times, and the New York Daily News. He received his Ph.D in economics from the University of Michigan.
David Shearman is Emeritus Professor of Medicine at Adelaide University and previously held senior positions at Edinburgh and Yale Universities.
He is author of many books relating to climate change, its science, consequences and democratic and other solutions; he served on the IPCC for two terms on health and scientific sections. He has been President of the Conservation Council of South Australia and with the late Professor Tony McMichael he founded Doctors for the Environment Australia in 2001 and was the Hon Secretary 2001- 2018.
He is author and co-author of several hundred scientific and medical papers and writes frequently for the media. He was awarded an AM for service to medicine and to climate change.
Dr Mark Diesendorf is currently Honorary Associate Professor in the School of Humanities & Languages, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, UNSW Sydney. He researches in the interdisciplinary fields of renewable energy, energy policy, ecological economics, and practical processes by which government, business and other organisations can achieve ecologically sustainable and socially just development.
Mark was originally trained as a physicist and applied mathematician. Previously, at various times, he was a Principal Research Scientist in CSIRO, Professor of Environmental Science and Founding Director of the Institute for Sustainable Futures at University of Technology Sydney, and Education Program Leader of the Australian Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living. His most recent book is Sustainable Energy Solutions for Climate Change (UNSW Press and Routledge-Earthscan).
Ha-Joon Chang is a South Korean institutional economist, specialising in development economics. He earned his undergraduate degree from Seoul National University, and an M.Phil and Ph.D from the University of Cambridge. He is well known for his work in institutionalist political economy, which is a study of economics that situates the economy in context with sociopolitical factors.
Currently he is a reader in the Political Economy of Development at the University of Cambridge. Chang is the author of several widely discussed policy books, most notably Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (2002).
Dr Geoff Davies is a scientist, commentator and the author most recently of Desperately Seeking the Fair Go (July 2017).
He is a retired Senior Fellow in geophysics at the Australian National University and has authored 100 scientific papers and two scientific books.
In 2005 he was awarded the inaugural Augustus Love medal for geodynamics by the European Geosciences Union, and he has been honoured as a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union.
Associate Professor Steven Hail is an Adjunct Associate Professor at Torrens University, having previously been a lecturer in economics in the School of Economics at the University of Adelaide for nearly 20 years, and is a research scholar at the Global Institute for Sustainable Prosperity. He regularly contributes to economic debates via magazine articles, radio interviews and podcasts.
During the 1990s, Steven trained bankers, including central bankers, and other finance professionals, in London, across the UK and internationally. More recently, he has lectured in all four universities in South Australia, usually in finance or macroeconomics. He is a teaching specialist, an advocate for teaching modern monetary theory to all economics students, and an activist in spreading an awareness of modern monetary theory to the broader public.
J.D. ALT is an architect and author in Annapolis, Maryland. He became interested in understanding—and explaining—Modern Monetary Theory in 2011 while researching a strategy for implementing affordable housing on a national scale. His novel, The Architect Who Couldn’t Sing, won the 2012 eLit Gold Award for architecture. He is a frequent contributor to New Economic Perspectives.
Michael Hudson is president of the Institute for the Study of Long-term Economic Trends (ISLET) in New York and London. Among his books on the politics of international finance are Super-Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire, and Global Fracture: The New International Economic Order, The Bubble and Beyond, and Finance Capital and its Discontents.
He formerly taught international economics at the New School for Social Research, Graduate Faculty (1969-72), and has traced the development of international trade and financial theory in Trade, Development and Foreign Debt (Pluto Press, 1993).
Lars Jörgen Pålsson Syll is a Swedish economist who is a Professor of Social Studies and Associate professor of Economic History at Malmö University College. Lars Syll has been a prominent contributor to the economic debate in Sweden over the global financial crisis that began in 2008.
Associate Professor Philip Lawn is currently a research officer with the Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity at Flinders University, a visiting lecturer in economics in the School of Economics at the University of Adelaide, a research scholar at the Global Institute for Sustainable Development and a senior research fellow with the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (University of Newcastle).
Phil has for many years been one of Australia’s leading ecological economists, working to build a bridge between modern monetary theory and ecological economics. He has written a series of articles and books on the principles, indicators, and policy aspects of sustainable development – most notably Resolving the Climate Change Crisis: The Ecological Economics of Climate Change (2016).
Associate Professor Lawn is a pioneer of the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), a superior indicator of social well-being to Gross Domestic Product, and in 2017 produced a report for the Government of South Australia, estimating the Genuine Progress Indicator for the state, and comparing South Australia with the rest of the country, across the range of environmental, social and economic indicators which are included in the GPI. He is currently developing a set of consistent GPI accounts for most countries in the world, to serve as a guide to policy makers internationally.
Adair Turner (Lord Turner of Ecchinswel) chairs the Energy Transitions Commission, a global coalition of major power and industrial companies, investors, environmental NGOs and experts working out achievable pathways to limit global warming to well below 2˚C by 2040 while stimulating economic development and social progress.
He was chairman of the Institute for New Economic Thinking until January 2019, where he remains a Senior Fellow. He is Chairman of Chubb Europe and on the Advisory Board of Envision Energy, a Shanghai-based group focussed on renewable energy, batteries and digital systems.
He has been closely involved with the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET)
L. Randall Wray, Ph.D. is Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Research Director with the Center for Full Employment and Price Stability and Senior Research Scholar at The Levy Economics Institute. His research expertise is in: financial instability, macroeconomics, and full employment policy.
Frank Stilwell is Professor Emeritus in Political Economy at the University of Sydney. He is the coordinating editor of the Journal of Australian Political Economy. He has written and edited 20 books on political economic topics, most recently ‘The Political Economy of Inequality’ (Polity Press 2019).
Dr. David F. Ruccio is Professor Emeritus at the University of Notre Dame, where he was a professor of economics from 1982 to 2019. He was also a member of the Higgins Labor Studies Program and the Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. He won the Kaneb Teaching Award, the Rev. Edmund P. Joyce, C.S.C. Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching, and an American Association of University Professors Academic Freedom Award.
Dr. Ruccio received his undergraduate degree from Bowdoin College in 1976 (during which he spent a year at the Universidad Nacional del Centro in Huancayo, Peru) and completed his Ph.D. in Economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 1984 (with a dissertation on mathematical models and optimal planning theory). He served as Area Studies Coordinator and the Director of Latin American Studies at the University of Notre Dame from 1984 to 1991, and was a fellow of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies from 1982 to 1999.
Dr Patricia Ranald is an honorary research associate at the University of Sydney and is the convener of the Australian Fair Trade and Investment Network.
Dr Ranald holds a Master’s Degree in Political Science from the University of Adelaide and a Master of Public Policy degree from the Graduate School of Business at the University of Sydney. Her Doctoral thesis in International Relations at the University of NSW was a comparative study of the World Trade Organisation and regional trade agreements, and won the UNSW Humanities Research Centre Award for best doctoral thesis of 2000.
Dr. Ted Trainer is a Conjoint Lecturer in the School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales.
He has taught and written about sustainability and justice issues for many years.
He is also developing Pigface Point, an alternative lifestyle educational site near Sydney, and a website for use by critical global educators, which can be viewed at: http://thesimplerway.info/
Warwick Smith is an honorary fellow at the University of Melbourne’s School of Social and Political Sciences, a Research Fellow at progressive think tank Per Capita. He is also Co-founder and Economist at the Castlemaine Institute. His current academic research includes the role of expert opinion in macroeconomic forecasting and the accumulation of disadvantage over the life course. Warwick’s research interests are very broad, including evidence in public policy making, taxation economics, gender economics, ageing populations, the economics of climate change, and the history and philosophy of economics.
Dr Cameron Murray is an economist with a passion for improving society. He specialises in property markets, resource and environmental economics, and corruption. His research on grey corruption in Australia has been transformed into a book called Game of Mates: How favours bleed the nation. The book explains how the Game of grey corruption is played, how much it costs us, and what we can do about it.
Cameron also teaches at the University of Queensland, blogs at fresheconomicthinking.com, tweets at @DrCameronMurray and his Facebook page is Fresh Economic Thinking.
Christopher Sheil, BA (Hons), PhD, is a social historian whose principal interest is in the history of labour. He is also an Adjunct Professor in social policy at Boston University (Sydney Academic Centre), and a former member of the Senior Executive Service in the NSW Cabinet Office. He has been a senior policy official under six governments (four Labor and two Liberal-National), has served on over 60 national and state government social and economic policy committees (including a dozen cabinet committees), and is the author or editor of well over 200 academic and government publications.
Robert Reich is an American economist, professor, author, lawyer, and political commentator. He served in the administrations of Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, as well as serving as the United States Secretary of Labor from 1993 to 1997 under President Bill Clinton. He was a member of President Barack Obama’s economic transition advisory board.
He has been the Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at UC Berkeley since January 2006. Robert formerly served as a professor at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and professor of social and economic policy at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management of Brandeis University.
Professor Steve Keen is a Distinguished Research Fellow at UCL, the author of The New Economics: A Manifesto (2021) Debunking Economics (2011) and Can We Avoid Another Financial Crisis? (2017), and one of the few economists to anticipate the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, for which he received the Revere Award from the Real World Economics Review. His main research interests are developing the complex systems approach to macroeconomics, and the economics of climate change. He has over 100 refereed publications on financial instability, money creation, logical and mathematical flaws in conventional and Marxian economic theory, the role of energy in production, and many other topics. He is ranked in 19th in Academic Influence’s list of influential economists.
He designed the Open Source system dynamics program Minsky (https://sourceforge.net/projects/minsky/), which is the first program to allow monetary economic models to be designed visually.
He has previously been Professor of Economics at Kingston University London and the University of Western Sydney, Australia.
He is active on Twitter as @ProfSteveKeen, and is crowdfunding his non-mainstream research into economics via Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/ProfSteveKeen.
When: Thursday 28 January 2021, 6:00pm start Where: The Braggs lecture theatre (or online on Zoom if necessary)
Speakers: Professor Barbara Pocock, Mark Butler MP and Rebekha Sharkie MP
Dr John Hermann is one of the co-founders of ERA, and is currently ERA Secretary and Editor of the ERA Review. His formal training is in Applied Mathematics and Physics, and he was employed as a scientist for many years, within the UK and Australia.
In 1990 his attention was first drawn to the parlous state of neoclassical economics, and out of interest since that time he has been engaged in a long journey of learning and discovery within the broad field of heterodox economics.
Bernard Thomson has had a long standing interest in economics and financial systems. He led the establishment of the Australian association for Rethinking Economics and manages a number of not for profit websites (including this one).
Bernard has a BSc Hons degree in Economics (Philosophy) from the London school of Economics and a post graduate diploma in Disputes Resolution. His career experience is in business management, organisational and leadership development in the not for profit sector.